-
Diversity & Equality
Working with organisations to reflect and embrace diversity in practical and tangible ways...
Full Details » -
Research & Development
Offering a range of services including evaluating customer & client needs and aspirations...
Full Details » -
Communications
Providing event management and communications solutions, inclucing campaigns, press launches...
Full Details » -
Human Resources
Providing solutions on a variety of areas including recruitment, leadership, assessment...
Full Details »
Welcome to MDA
MDA
is an independent consultancy that offers a range of services in four main
areas: diversity and equality; research and development; communications; and
human resources. We pride ourselves on being innovative, and also taking a
practical approach where needed, customising our services to clients' needs and
requirements. For full details of our core areas, see:
We
have clients in all areas, private, voluntary and public sectors, and work with
organisations of all sizes. These range from small voluntary organisations to
large corporate multi-nationals and government departments.
We
also work with a number of highly experienced and knowledgeable Associates. They include lawyers,
communications specialists, researchers and others specialising in HR issues
and change management.
Latest News
Posted: 10th October 2008
Compulsory
retirement can be justified
On 23 September, Advocate General Mazak handed down his opinion in the case of Age Concern v Secretary of State for BERR (case C-388/07), or what has become known as the ‘Heyday’ challenge. It concludes that the question would be for the High Court (not the ECJ) to decide whether the compulsory retirement provisions are ‘objectively and reasonably justified in the context of the national law by a legitimate aim relating to employment policy and the labour market and it is not apparent that the means put in place to achieve that aim of public interest are inappropriate and unnecessary for the purpose’
It should be noted that the Advocate General’s opinion is not binding on the ECJ although it tends to follow such opinions in about 80% of cases. The Court is not expected to give their definitive ruling until 2009. In the meantime all compulsory retirement claims have been stayed pending the ECJ decision.
